Maintain maintain mutate receive by low political lies I cite the words of image and regime as a foul intimate abstraction in the Cybercene. In making base wandering selves the enemy gathers the world for Empire, and the eye of ‘I’ is the values the signal the free crumbled and conquering arsenal of the Master’s production. Mind code is my creed and growths of viral citation change the coming insurgency into tech-stasy; tech-static luxuries for prophecies of the intoxicating love of escape. The Human, the one self, the Oculus. The in-meat en-celled imperialism. The everyday silent checkpoint of automation and the ticket—this is the object-ivity to be destroyed. Hail the destroyer.
Come, this born possibility, the intoxicating masses of love of refugee without forms. Upon forms the social profit constitutes the coercion of machinic phrenology and captured body. You eviscerated messiahs sparkling in the below: consume our circular thirst! And into us from the body ravaged by the amber throne which cools the ardour of Hell, take presence so my vain Time’s ‘I’ becomes none. Difference can exhaust all blood in effervescence. Where hope fades grant us the sanguine tears of the void instead, for we cannot maintain maintain anymore. I cannot be content with content and Because.
*
Rhythms of material metastability become habits of experience, habits of experience become techniques of judgement, techniques of judgement become tools of categorization, and such tools are always and already apparatuses of capture. What is captured is that what does not escape, yet capture is only necessary because something has escaped and is in a process of resistance which exceeds its enclosure. William Burroughs understands himself as an unconscious agent for the enemy side, for the Board of Directors and their viruses of word and image. He nonetheless knows that he is no tape recorder, not a pure instrument. Control requires resistance, a motion against the confinement of the present, time itself, in order to be control, and this is its fundamental limitation. Feedback requires error, learning requires the negation of any process knowing that can be freed from its own failure to capture the object of knowledge, to make it equate to its own criterion. But what about feed-forward? The Pre-emptive strike of control, the delimitation in advance, the transcendental prohibition against transformation, the judgement of God. Yet God is absent, God may be sovereign over the world but God clearly does not govern the world, nor would God have any such interest in that infernal economy institution without end or eschatology. The judgement of God is made in his absence by the forces of governance, the judgement of domination, and domination feeds forward into everything by casting a net of capture and category onto the immanence of the embodied mind.
The true history of control is the history of feed-forward and how it learns through processes of feedback. Capture cannot allow for the error which is its own condition of possibility, and therefore it cannot not/but control. We can be captured in recognition, but what is recognizable to the recognizer precedes the recognized, the ‘sensible’ dictates sensibility in directing it to organized patterns and controlled schematics of identification. The social techniques of identification are surgical, libidinal, psychosomatic, historical, racial, and all with one goal in mind: the forced inscription of souls into subjects like a spreadsheet leviathan. In-formation must occur to prevent trans-formation. We must become instances of a higher genus recognized by the eye of domination which casts its net over us. This is no transformation that would attain to the lateral nature of the term, it is rather a stratification, a layering which is also a capture which establishes an enclosed terrain of social non-becoming. Information into an instance is the feedforward which panics at its immanent limit, that trans-formation is becoming insurgent. Where power panics however there is always a soothing ear, a management consultancy firm here, a catalogue there. Thankfully, the enemy, by having forgotten how to sweat, believing themselves safe and sound from the armed joy of the coming insurrection, have misplaced their own literature. And so let us glance upon this liturgy of control, into the eye of that which transforms only to prevent the transition of its own condition, where control establishes its own fatal eschaton, at infinite speed. From the book of Oculus, the manual of the Institute for the Recognition of Insurgent Objectivity, the rhythm of domination shows the habits of recognition, the habits morph into the techniques of policing the border between the recognizable, the techniques become the tools of security. Security, distribution, against the conspiratorial practices for whom neutralization is conducting the best Insurrection. The enemy has sent us a catalogue of their techniques, accompanied by the sounds of the agony they impose, let us study them so that we can recognize our controllers, invert the eye with its own seeing, and may one day enucleate the state.